Archive for January, 2007

Crowning glory

Monday, January 22nd, 2007

Move over darling Elizabeth, I’ve been crowned. Not once, not twice, thrice naw, in the name of the wee man I had four crowns fitted today…on my teeth, some sort of porcelain/ceramic concoction fixed with dental cement. Weird, weird, weird feeling. They’re ‘normal’ teeth. But I’ve never had normal teeth (always a peg-shaped front tooth and massive overbite that Glasgow Dental School could never fix when I was a teenager) so they feel a bit strange and they’ll take a bit of getting used to. They’re also how shall we put it, whiter than my natural teeth and suspiciously straight and smooth, they look a bit like a gleaming block of yuppie flats in amongst a slum area. Haven’t quite worked up enough courage to try biting yet. Dentist said I didn’t look too excited looking at them in the mirror. Again I’m just not a visual person, looks don’t thrill me, functionality every time. Maybe part of me was also thinking “Christ I could have bought a MacBook Pro for what I’ve just had put into my mouth”.

I’ve gone through this pretty gory,gruelling treatment programme not for looks but to try to restore by biting ability, still some fillings to get done on the back teeth. When it comes to the crunch - my test will be can I bite into an apple without leaving a trail of blood round the bite, with my old decayed teeth there were plenty of foods I just wouldn’t contemplate eating for fear of breaking/snapping off teeth. Because the front teeth are straight now rather than concave previously the net effect is that right now they feel like buck teeth, sticking out more, so I better do some Janet Street Porter impressions quickly before they settle down. Will I be able to whistle again? Friends and family are hoping not.

Technorati Tags: ,

Hilary ascending Everest?

Monday, January 22nd, 2007

Pleased to see Hilary Rodham Clinton throwing her hat or is it bunnet into the ring for the race for Democratic presidential candidate in the United States. If someone like Hillary with all her insider experience doesn’t give it a go, who the hell will? I’ve seen some English press describe her as a potential “American Mrs. Thatcher”. Dear God No! Wouldn’t wish that on my worst enemy. If anyone thinks that by voting for a woman you’ll get a kinder, gentler brand of politics you may be in for a shock. It’s a bruising game politics, “showbiz for ugly people”, internal party politics tend to make a virtue of backstabbing and taking advantage of any faux pas by your peers to climb a very greasy pole indeed. To get to the top you need a skin of asbestos, oh and truckloads of money. I think Hilary may benefit from the support of a lot of women who still haven’t quite forgiven Bill Clinton for “not having sex with that woman”, cough. Many at the time thought that Hilary conducted herself with admirable strength of character in public despite this crushing episode in her private life and it may be this that strikes a chord in female voters memories and sympathy rather than any high and mighty policy stance. Will the US campaign be about issues or character? The Democrats don’t need another Kerry, worthy but dull. The president is a different role. Charisma is compulsory, and as George W has shown, brains are optional.

Given how many “dirty tricks” there have been known to be pulled in negative advertising/campaigning in politics with the battleground moving away from TV/Radio/Press to the internet will we start to see electronic versions of skulduggery? What if a candidate using the web for fund raising for a campaign just so happened to have a DoS attack on their website whilst their opponents stayed up? Or with a lot of sites moving to Open Source content management systems and blogs it would only take one security patch to be missed for any nefarious opposition to take advantage. Beef up your security teams and for any presidential candidates buying a one year domain name from GoDaddy you have switched on the auto-renew haven’t you? Don’t want your virtual branding to be expiring next year, do you? Barack Obama’s in it for the long haul, his domain’s secured until 28-Dec-2015, you can’t say he’s not planning ahead :-)

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Summoning the elusive muse

Sunday, January 21st, 2007

I had a dream. A bit unusual really because I normally don’t remember dreams but this one had a pair of characters from a previous attempt at NaNoWriMo turning up and dutifully supplying a storyline that would have taken me over the 50K finish line (I ran out of plot/steam). Thing was it was not for 2006 but 2005. Where have these dormant characters been? Better late than never? What to do now though, dig out the documents and write it up just for the hell of it? Too late to ‘win’. Let it pass? Frustrating when you have the creativity you don’t have the time and when you have the time you don’t have the creativity. Grrr.

Technorati Tags: ,

The Act of Union. 1707 tae noo - three hunner years o it. Tricentenary? I’ll tricencentary ye

Tuesday, January 16th, 2007

Well get the flags out, fetch the war time bunting. Let’s celebrate the 300th anniversary of The Act of Union. What? No parade? No parties? No well, really nothing past the odd, and I do mean odd, quasi documentary about it on the telly. Only a newly minted coin, ironic since the AoU was largely brought about over finances. Ho hum. Anything to celebrate? After three hundred years of a marriage of convenience who can blame us for the apathetic weariness about our aged, coupled bones?

Disclosure: every election I’ve ever been eligible for bar one tactical vote that pained me has had me vote for various parties/individuals that support a platform of Independence for Scotland. It’s the only issue I cast my vote for. I truly don’t believe Scotland can ever really flourish properly without sole control over its affairs. I wish we could take a tip from all the wee countries in Eastern Europe that in the last few decades have rediscovered their own sense of identity and culture and entrepreneurialism after their liberation from rule by remote powers. Might take a while and Christ knows there’d be pain to go through but it is possible to throw off the shackles and stand on our own two feet.

I happen to think devolution is great and for its time is a highly pragmatic and sensible measure, I’m not actually critical of that, I think there’s a great deal been achieved with this arrangement, just a pity that the populace has long since stopped trusting politicians to the extent that even good things pass without generating much appreciation. And so much is woefully under reported or shunted on to minority media channels unseen/unheard. Main bulletins tend to only latch on to Executive and First minister stuff but true democracy in action has actually materialised more through the committee system in the Parliament rather than just the floor of the debating chamber. When people are ‘bored’ by politics we need to start ringing alarm bells before we sound death knells for democracy. Wake up! It’s a pity the controversy over the fabric of the building of the Scottish Parliament has been of more public concern than what’s been happening inside. The petitions committee in particular, quietly gets on with letting individuals and organisations have a direct line into the legislative process. You can see how appeals and ‘taking evidence’ from civic society has lead to redrafting of bills in ways that just fit better with the existing infrastructure. These ‘tweaks’ don’t get much press though. Under devolution there’s been time to really look at what kind of legislation our country needs and deal with our different local authority structure. Do folk really need to be reminded of how little legislative time for Scotland there was pre-devolution? It used to be a Bill for UK then if we were lucky a few pages tacked on the end as an after-thought even when the whole of the concept of law in progress was wrong. Poll tax anyone? A country with significant challenges of geography does not always have the same needs as our flatter, more urban cousins south of the border. How much more could we do with full fiscal autonomy?

My main want for independence would be for us to remove the obscene presence of a nuclear ‘deterrent’ hosted less than an hour away from where I live. Hollow laughter from me I’m afraid when Bush/Blair tried the scare tactics during the pre-amble to Iraq II of “Oh, he’s (the bad man Saddam) got a bomb…a weapon of mass destruction”. Yeah well so do we…on our fucking doorstep and we pay taxes for this affront to humanity. Why doesn’t George Bush carpet bomb us then? The amount of money spent on weapons whose sole aim is to kill people (defence ma erse) is something truly disgusting. What could our country do if such hateful vanity was disposed of and we concentrated on putting the lives of human beings first.

Try and have a listen to a wonderful session from the Edinburgh University A Puzzle from the Past: Why the Scottish Enlightenment Happened ” with the brilliant Professor Tom Devine and including the ever-articulate Joyce McMillian (herself a member of the panel that blueprinted the structure of how the parliament would be structured and what procedures would be used). How could such a wee country like ourselves have such a disproportionate effect on economics and politics all those years ago. Why have we lost our self-confidence through the years? Where’s the collective intelligence to think for ourselves gone?

If Scots want independence we’ll get it, it’s as simple as that. England is not the enemy. Apathy and indifference is.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Ken Russell leaves Celebrity Big Brother

Sunday, January 7th, 2007

Ach, good while it lasted. Haven’t watched the live feed today yet but from the chatter on the BB forums sounds like the combination of introduction of Jackiey (Jade’s mum) and the servants task is causing havoc in the house and more celebs are wanting to leave. Still there’s one advantage the early leavers from the BB house have and that is they are out and free to take part in all the spin-off shows radio and TV segments so ironically they might get a wee bit more of the telly spotlight to themselves rather than have to tag along under the shadow of the winner at the end.

Film Four screened “Women in Love” again the other night. I forgot that there’s a sequence where Glenda Jackson dances among a pack of Highland Coos. Ye canny make it up.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Cheap but good quality podcast new recorders from Olympus

Saturday, January 6th, 2007

A while ago I was bemoaning the lack of medium quality digital recorder devices (everyone concentrating on players instead). The Podcasting News site has a mouth watering description of three new recorder models from Olympus: DS-30, DS-40 and DS-50. What I think is important here is the conjunction of quality recording bitrates with affordability. I’ve read a few other pioneering podcasting projects that used ‘ordinary’ Olympus dictation devices as a prototypes in organisation-wide podcasting systems but they all agreed that although they were affordable and simple to use the low audio quality was the weak point. These new models could make Olympus a serious player, or is that recorder in the entry-level podcaster market. Something newbies find is that they buy expensive microphones/mixers and connect them to their computer but forget that they have a noisy machine so are forever trying to post-process the sound to remove fan/central heating/air conditioning noises in the fixed location. Having a cheap but good quality recording device that could be used in a more acoustically friendly environment or outdoors for vox pops/sound seeing tours could make a big difference. It’s maybe a small market right now, but over the last couple of years there’s not been much competition from hardware companies competing with new products.
Olympus Intros Three Digital Recorders for Podcasting

Reading the description is sounds like Olympus has been listening (ha!) hard to the wish lists from podcasters and at long enabling visually impaired users to have a non-visual way of operating the device (almost all rely on cryptic, inaccessible menuing systems). Folk like Shelly have been lobbying long and hard to get the likes of Apple to improve the accessibility of iTunes and iPods but with little result. Olympus seem like they’re moving in the right direction.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Legacy

Saturday, January 6th, 2007

Interesting but not at all surprising:

70 per cent of firms rely on legacy systems put in before 1996, says survey

With all the hoopla about Web 2.0 and start-ups it might give the impression that most of IT is taken up by writing new code and products. In reality most jobbing programmers are maintaining and extending existing systems rather than new projects. Many times something stable and well-understood is much easier to learn and use simply because of the pain that your peers have gone through to get that stability before you, things that have been around longer tend to have larger pools of developers with experience, more support/documentation available etc. so although they may be ‘old’ they’re not necessarily worse than something new. For every successful startup there are many failures, business entrepreneurs just fold that experience into their portfolio, learn from it and make the next project better but how about the IT folk? Technologies change all the time, you can make the same general mistakes but in a fast-changing environment yes you may be battle-scarred from a previous project but how much practically you can take forward can be tricky if the next project doesn’t have something in common with what you’ve worked on before even basics like platform/language.

The downside of maintenance is the real drain on productivity, a particular headache I find working with legacy systems is a malady that takes many forms, I call it “versionitis” - the versions of the product in use in a system are older than the vendors recommended release version and faults are indicating that an upgrade should fix the problem/improve performance/security. Snag is products these days tend to be an amalgam of multiple other third-party elements. Say you have 3 components one gets upgraded but second component isn’t compatible with the upgrade, wait around for 2nd component to upgrade then 3rd breaks…and so on you can go round in circles and never move forward. With Open Source you could have a go and try fixing it yourself but when you are relying on a paid closed-source vendor you’re pretty powerless. You have to watch upgrade notices like a hawk to try and find that Nirvana where subsystems sing in perfect harmony like the Coke advert. But you can gobble up oodles of valuable time experimenting trying out patches and upgrades, backing up, rolling back. Not all upgrades are good news, it’s fairly common for a new patch to also inadvertently introduce a new bug that is in fact more serious than the original fault you were trying to fix.
Who can blame vendors for wanting to improve the baseline code customers use by encouraging upgrading to bug fixed, feature enhanced versions? Fewer support problems…for them. In practice it’s it’s not always feasible or even possible from a resource point of view to make the change. I’ve run into a small version of this recently where we’re using a product that the application vendors strongly recommend using a particular version of DB as that’s all they support and can guarantee the product is tested under(?!), the snag is that third-party DB vendors have stopped offering support and have withdrawn the binaries/sources for that version which is now over three years old. So there’s no easy way for me to create a testbed for the product with that DB version, what can I try? How about trying the nearest point version and hope for the best that the application and the database get along without trouble? It’s frustrating when you don’t have control over the ingredients for the recipe for success.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Bet on Ken Russell. Someone has to

Thursday, January 4th, 2007

Well better put my money where my mouth is. Bless him but grand-père terrible Ken Russell has a snowball’s chance in hell of winning Celebrity Big Brother but I’m still putting a bet on him to win…as snowballs go 20-1 makes pretty good fantasy odds :-)

Technorati Tags: ,

Le Guen est gaun. Au revoir

Thursday, January 4th, 2007

Rangers have lost again, this time it’s only a manager and not a match, phew, well that’s a relief eh boys?

The report says “Rangers manager Paul Le Guen has left the club by mutual consent“. Aye right. Bet the air was blue.
BBC SPORT | Football | My Club | Rangers | Le Guen and Rangers part company

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Ken Russell…you old devil! Celebrity Big Brother - genius in the house

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007

With all the ’spoilers’ in the Sunday press about who’s going to be in the Celebrity Big Brother house I wasn’t particularly looking forward to this year. However they were wrong about several and to my great delight one of my all time heros, film director Ken Russell is in the house. Ya beauty! He’s a one-off original. I was wondering what he was up to these days as he doesn’t seem to be making episodes for the South Bank show each year like he used to. Last time I heard about him he was filming some schlocky low-budget film with a hand-held video for the internet, seemed to involve naked nuns (old habits die hard). He’s almost 80 you know. Camp as Christmas but with an eye for the ladies.
Sad that practically none of the other housemates seemed to know who he is. He’s a quite unique artist who brings the full earthiness of life and passion, flesh and blood into his films. He spent time in the sixties working for Huw Weldon on arty documentaries of composers that broke new ground and breathed new life into biographic film. And so many films with music at the core or with sumptuous soundtracks Tommy, Mahler, Aria and plenty of pop/operatic videos. So many films full-stop. Plenty of box office turkeys in latter years but for sheer bloody inventiveness always worth watching.

In the dark days of British cinema with folk whinging about lack of money he got off his bahookey and assembled a crew and shot many films around the Lake District, no matter what country they were supposed to be set in :-) Yes they were cheap but you couldn’t fault the wild imagination. Glasgow, as far as I’m aware, still holds the dubious distinction of being a city that still bans his film “The Devils” from being screened in cinemas (for fear of igniting a religion-fueled backlash from Catholics) but strangely allows it sold in video/DVD. Watching “the devils” on video for the first time was amazing, if you can push past all the sensationalism about the sexual scenes and concentrate on the story there’s really a rather moving morality tale in there contrasting the true believers as flawed individuals with the outwardly pious but privately corrupt religious authorities, and with such startling production design from the late Derek Jarman - it looks absolutely stunning visually.

I really urge you to seek out a copy of Ken’s autobiography “A British Picture”, it is hilarious, especially his various colourful and hair-raising adventures with Oliver Reed.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,